I just finished reading Late To The Ball by Gerald Marzorati, a
former editor of the New York Times Magazine, in which he tells his story about
taking up tennis in his early 60s and the lessons he learned, both in terms of
technique/tactics and lessons about himself. I liked his book (and the clever
title) very much. He started playing singles competitively but toward the end
of the book he shifted to play doubles. He quotes an email from his wife on the
differences between singles and doubles that I like.
“Singles is a fearsome
struggle for independence at best; at worst it is a denial of the other’s
humanity. But doubles is different. A devoted team can help each other grow so
much. You’re talking about fellowship, and the delicate, intricate, wondrous
balance between autonomy and dependency.”
I think her description of the dynamics of doubles actually applies to relationships in general whether it’s friendships, family or marriages.
I also think her depiction of singles is a bit harsh. I’m sure
many people who play competitive singles do indeed want to impose their will on
their opponent. I lean more toward Tim Gallwey’s idea that a goal of playing
tennis, whether it’s singles or doubles, is to bring out the best in yourself.
To do that you need the best from your opponent. Therefore playing ultimately
is a cooperative exercise. I figure if you’re playing on the professional
circuit your goal is strictly to win, rise in the rankings and make enough
money to survive, without being concerned how your opponent feels about losing.
The same for playing in USTA amateur leagues and tournaments. Yet, I noticed at
the very top of the pro ranks (Djokovic, Nadal, Federer and Murray) there is
mutual respect and appreciation for a well-played match. Even in the mixed
doubles USTA matches I played this winter (for the first time in my tennis
career at the age of 65!), there usually is mutual respect. Most of my
opponents were fair and friendly. A few resorted to gamesmanship in an attempt
to get into my head. (Good luck finding anything in there!) But overall all four
of us on the court were looking for a competitive, well-fought match.
Getting back to Marzorati book, you could also take the title to
mean arriving late to a ball as in a formal dance party. Whether or not this
double meaning was intentional I’d say the second meaning of the “ball” is
appropriate too. Playing tennis can be thought of as a dance.
